Halloween Horrors: Giant Insects

October 26th, 2024

If you’re easily freaked out by ordinary insects, you might not to want this giant insects video:

Obviously AI, but pretty well done. The guy’s entire channel features more of this sepia-toned nightmare fuel…

Halloween Horrors: Pitch Meeting for The Shining

October 25th, 2024

What’s more Halloween than an iconic horror movie directed by iconic director Stanley Kubrick from an iconic horror novel by Stephen King mocked by iconic Ryan George?

Honestly, I remember not being all that impressed with The Shining when I saw it back in the 1980s. A rewatch is probably overdue.

(And for fans of The Shining, this odd item might be of interest…)

Library Addition: Signed, Numbered Edition of Joe R. Lansdale’s The Nightrunners

October 24th, 2024

Someone on eBay was selling off a bunch of Dark Harvest limiteds, and I picked up three of them for a comparative song. This is the first.

Lansdale, Joe R. The Nightrunners. Dark Harvest, 1987. First edition hardback, #60 of 300 numbered copies signed by Lansdale, introduction author Dean R. Koontz, and illustrator Gregory Manchess, a Fine copy in a Fine dust jacket and a Fine slipcase; a pristine, mint copy. Joe’s most splatterpunk work. Supplements both the lettered slipcrate edition and the trade edition I bought and had Joe sign back when it came out, so I now have all three states. Isajanko, A009.a.ii. Person/Orbaugh/Lansdale, “Joe Lansdale: Notes Toward a Bibliography,” 10a. Chalker/Owings, page 120 (Jack was not a fan of the novel). Bought off eBay for $75.

By way of coincidence, I will have a copy of the trade edition of The Nightrunners signed by both Lansdale and Koontz in the next Lame Excuse Books catalog.

Halloween Horrors: The Existential Dread of Simulation Theory

October 23rd, 2024

How about a nice helping of existential dread for the Halloween season? But instead of worrying that you’re a fragile shell of decaying cells whose inevitable demise will terminate your brief, flickering existence in a howling void of meaningless nothingness, it’s the worry that neither you nor your too, too fragile husk is real at all, and that you’re just a string of 1s and 0s being run inside a computer.

Welcome to simulation theory!

  • “Would everything we see, everything we experience, everything that exists in our entire universe be artificial? Supporters of simulation theory believe that not only is it possible that we’re living in a simulation, it’s likely.”
  • “Modern simulation theory comes from Nick Bostrom, a philosopher at Oxford, who wrote an influential paper on the subject in 2003 assuming that living in a simulation is possible. Bostrom presents the simulation trilemma, which says one of the following must be true:
    1. We destroy ourselves before we’re able to create a simulation.
    2. We’re able to create a simulation, but choose not to. Or
    3. We are definitely in a simulation.

    Bostrom believes each of these is equally likely to be true.”

  • “When a civilization can create a realistic simulation, the most obvious one to create is that of its own early existence. Bostrom calls this an ancestral simulation, and a civilization that can do this wouldn’t just create one simulation, it would create many, and those simulated civilizations might create their own simulations of the universe, and on and on, like Russian nesting dolls of reality.”
  • Elon Musk and Neil deGrasse Tyson both think it’s possible we’re living in a simulation.
  • “In that program, our program, all the laws of the universe, electromagnetism and gravitational force, are written into the program. The speed of light gets a value. There’s code for Planck’s constants of mass, speed, and time. Avogadro’s number is in there, along with a bunch of other rules that govern the behavior of everything that exists, all part of our program. Even consciousness itself is part of our simulation.”
  • Philip K. Dick “believed there are many universes, and sometimes those other realities bleed into ours. He claimed to have visions of this, and even wrote stories like The Man in the High Castle, based on these visions, that in fact plural realities did exist superimposed onto one another, like so many film transparencies.”
  • “One way other realities blend into ours could be The Mandela Effect. The Mandela Effect is when a large number of people have memories of events that don’t match reality. This is called The Mandela Effect because millions of people specifically remember Nelson Mandela died in prison. He didn’t. People remember his wife walking beside his casket in a funeral procession that was on television for two hours that day. This never happened.”
  • I’m snipping the other Mandela Effect examples, but I would swear that Jaws’ girlfriend actually had braces in Moonraker.
  • “Philip K. Dick also felt when we experienced deja vu is because something in our simulated universe changed and a new timeline branched off of the current one. We are living in a computer-programmed reality, and the only clue we have to it is when some variable is changed.”
  • “Ever feel like you’ve lived a moment before? That’s because, according to Philip K. Dick and others, you have. Deja vu is the simulation correcting itself with new information.”
  • It also explains the Drake Equation: “Are we really alone in the universe or does our program only focus on us?”
  • “Max Tegmark, a cosmologist at MIT, said the strict laws of physics point to the possibility of a simulation putting a cap on the speed of light. Sure is a good way to keep your sims from venturing out too far from home.”
  • Skipping over the “error correcting code in string theory equations” bit because string theory is garbage.
  • The deep embedding of math at every level of the universe argues in favor of simulation theory. “We see Fibonacci numbers and the golden ratio everywhere.”
  • “No matter what we study, whether it’s something the size of a galaxy or as small as an electron, everything in the universe seems to follow patterns and rules. In other words, a program.”
  • The continued growth of computing power indicates how powerful computers in the future could run complex simulations.
  • While it’s said that you would need a computer the size of the universe to simulate the universe, that’s not true. Just as in modern simulations, you only need to render what someone is paying attention to at any given time.
  • The famous double slit experiment is evidence that the universe only renders things when we’re paying attention. “It’s as if the particles are aware they’re being observed.”
  • “Even though our universe is full of galaxies, those galaxies may not actually be there. If we’re living in a simulation, then stars and galaxies could simply be projections, and only when we get up close, those projections become more detailed. This is an excellent way to save computational resources. And because we’re stuck with a hard limit of the speed of light, getting to far-off places is really difficult.”
  • Personally, I think simulation theory is probably wrong for a meta-critique reason. All previous metaphorical understanding of the universe (as clockwork mechanism, as organism) have proven wrong, so this one is likely to be wrong as well…

    Library Addition: Signed First of Donald Wandrei’s Dark Odyssey

    October 21st, 2024

    L. W. Currey had a sale, and this is the item that jumped out at me as worth picking up:

    Wandrei, Donald. Dark Odyssey. Webb Publishing, 1931. First edition hardback, 118 of 400 signed, numbered copies, a Very Good copy with significant wear at head and heel and bumping at points, in a Good+ only dust jacket with 1 1/2″ spine loss at heel, 1″ spine loss at head, plus a few 1/4″ chips at dj top edge, wear at points, and a bit of rubbing; not great, but a mostly complete example of the notoriously fragile gold foil dust jacket. Poetry collection. At a 94 years old, it’s not the oldest dust jacket in my collection (I have an H.G. Wells first in dust jacket from 1922), but it is among the oldest. Bleiler Checklist (1978), page 202. Bought for $25, marked down from $50.

    Halloween Horrors: Creepy Doorbell Footage

    October 18th, 2024

    How about some unsettling doorbell footage for the Halloween season? Some of it is of home invaders, and others that have ill intent, but some of it just seems to be of weird or deranged people whose motives are unclear.

    Library Addition: Avram Davidson’s A Goat for Azazel

    October 16th, 2024

    Another Dragonstairs Press book but this one is a bit different than their usual fare.

    Davidson, Avram, and Grania Davis. A Goat For Azazel: The Grandson of Eszterhazy Returns…Again. A Ghost Novel. First edition chapbook, #80 of 80 copies signed by afterword author Michael Swanwick. Pitch for a proposed Dr. Eszterhazy novel, including sections on setting, protagonists and an extensive plot synopses. “Hand-stitched, with wrappers made of Mexican amate bark paper, chosen to commemorate Avram’s and Grania’s years in Mexico.” Sold out within hours of being offered for sale.

    I will have a small number of copies available for sale in the next Lame Excuse Books catalog.

    Halloween Horror: Scottish Oil Rig Horror Game

    October 15th, 2024

    As I may have mentioned before, I don’t tend to play horror video games, despite reading horror, because I don’t care for some tropes of the genre that appear in almost every game (path dependency and jump scares being two), but I do enjoy watching Daz Games play them, since he freaks out enjoyably at some scenes.

    This time around he’s playing Still Wakes The Deep, a horror game set on a Scottish oil rig in the North Sea that manages to dredge up something horrifically eldritch. Though the path dependency is there, the game has two big things going for it: Superb voice acting for well-realized characters and a really detailed, immersive setting of a working oil rig that provides a lot of other dangers in addition to the monster.

    Library Addition: Signed First of Ray Bradbury’s That Son of Richard III

    October 14th, 2024

    Another signed Bradbury first:

    Bradbury, Ray. That Son of Richard III: A Birth Announcement. Roy A. Squires, 1974. First edition chapbook original, #LXIII of 85 the signed “Autograph Edition,” a Fine- copy with just a trace of wear at tips, in a Near Fine+ original Autograph Edition publisher’s envelope with slight age darkening at edges and slight bumping at tips. Chalker/Owings, page 589. Bought for $50 (marked down from $80) on eBay.

    Unnoted in Chalker/Owings is the fact that two of my three copies have a “PZ” glyph inscribed on the lower right side of the introduction page, just barely visible in the scan.

    This is my third copy of this Bradbury chapbook, following an association copy inscribed to Lord John press founder Herb Yellin and an unsigned copy of the “ordinary” edition. The ordinary copy has this, but the one inscribed to Yellin doesn’t. Bit of a mystery…

    Edited to add: Mystery solved! I checked with fellow bookseller (and Old Earth Books publisher) Mike Walsh to see if he could solve the glyph mystery, and he directed me to bookseller Terrance McVicker of Bats Over Books, who had the answer:

    The “PZ” you note in your query is actually “ZN,” printed on top of each other, if you turn it sideways. It stands for “Zerkall Nideggen.” Nideggen is a Japanese paper, but Zerkall was the German manufacturer. I think what Zerkall did was buy the pulp paper from Nideggen, then process it in their factory.

    What your seeing is the Zerkall Nideggen watermark. The sheet before cutting, measured 24″ X 36″ and there was a watermark in the lower right-hand corner of the full sheet. Which meant that, when the sheet was cut to quarto size, only one out of eight pages would have the watermark. Printers usually try to get one watermarked page per book/booklet, but it doesn’t always work out that way.

    Thanks for the info!

    Halloween Horrors: A Giant Animatronic Prop Collection

    October 10th, 2024

    In a follow-up to yesterday’s Transworld trade show post, here’s a guy that has a collection of over 150 Halloween animatronic props.

    His animatronic collection may or may not have been more expensive than my book collection to acquire, but I’m pretty sure it’s significantly more expensive to store…